Occupy Central
Occupy Central is a civil disobedience movement which began in Hong Kong on September 28, 2014. It calls on thousands of protesters to block roads and paralyse Hong Kong's financial district if the Beijing and Hong Kong governments do not agree to implement universal suffrage for the chief executive election in 2017 and the Legislative Council elections in 2020 according to "international standards." The movement was initiated by Benny Tai Yiu-ting (戴耀廷), an associate professor of law at the University of Hong Kong, in January 2013.
Umbrella Movement
The Umbrella Movement (Chinese: 雨傘運動; pinyin: yǔsǎn yùndòng) is a loose political movement that was created spontaneously during the Hong Kong protests of 2014. Its name derives from the recognition of the umbrella as a symbol of defiance and resistance against the Hong Kong government, and the united grass-roots objection to the decision of the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress (NPCSC) of 31 August.
The movement consists of individuals numbering in the tens of thousands who participated in the protests that began on 28 September 2014, although Scholarism, the Hong Kong Federation of Students, Occupy Central with Love and Peace, groups are principally driving the demands for the rescission of the NPCSC decision.
The movement consists of individuals numbering in the tens of thousands who participated in the protests that began on 28 September 2014, although Scholarism, the Hong Kong Federation of Students, Occupy Central with Love and Peace, groups are principally driving the demands for the rescission of the NPCSC decision.
Occupy Central site in an area surrounding the Legislative Council and Central Government Offices at Tamar were cleared 22-06-2015.
Hong Kong reform vote
The Hong Kong government’s political reform proposal for how the city elects its leader by universal suffrage for the first time in 2017 is based on a strict framework set by Beijing. The plan limits the number of candidates to two or three and requires them to win majority support from a 1,200 strong nominating committee. Arguing that this does not constitute genuine universal suffrage, pan-democratic lawmakers have vowed to reject the package, while pro-democracy groups have protested. The government’s resolution was to be put to a vote by the 70-member Legislative Council in June 2015, requiring a two-thirds majority to be passed.
POST OCCUPY CENTRAL - DAY 222
POST REFORM VOTE：DAY 37
POST REFORM VOTE：DAY 37
Full coverage of the day’s events on 25-07
Civil service head cuts holiday short to take up post
Clement Cheung Wan-ching had to cut short his summer vacation to take up his new job as secretary for the civil service.
Speaking on his first day, he said that while not expected back until next month, he was prepared to return at short notice in case of emergency.
"Actually my quick return is not that surprising: I was handling some private matters overseas but I was mentally prepared to return to Hong Kong for any reason," Cheung said.
"When I was told there was an appointment, I was able to return last night."
Despite intense media questioning, Cheung refused to say when exactly he knew of the appointment.
"What I want to focus on now is my work ... how to communicate with civil servants, how to work with them, how to encourage them, how to provide effective and high-quality public services," he said.
Previously the commissioner of customs and excise, which is equivalent to administrative officer staff Grade A or D6, Cheung bypassed the D8 grade, making him the bureau chief with the least administrative experience.
Asked if he is confident he can lead the 160,000-strong service, he said good communication was the key, rather than the grade.
"What [civil servants] most want to see is whether we can have frequent and smooth communication, if I can work with them as partners ... I believe this will be the most important factor."
His experience as head of postal and customs services is seen by Cheung as helpful in his new post as the former had 10 unions. Communication with the disciplinary forces and extending the retirement age of civil servants will be his priorities.
Asked to comment on his predecessor, Cheung said he admired Paul Tang Kwok-wai.
"I am also a civil servant. I have known him for many years and we often had communication. Mr Tang is a humble and easy-going person. He is also a colleague who is always willing to listen to others, I admire him very much,"
Leung Chun-ying may be at the heart of all the problems confronting his administration. Photo: HKEJ
CY’s black hole
There is a black hole at the heart of Leung Chun-ying’s administration, and its location can be precisely pinpointed to his office housed at that austere building in Tamar.
No one knows exactly what goes into the black hole, but it soon becomes clear what comes out.
Precisely because the black hole exists, suspicion lingers every time something emerges from this dark space.
When, as happened this week, two principal officials were suddenly removed, there was a flurry of speculation as to why they were ejected.
When, as happened this week, the chief executive stands accused of giving special help to a major property developer and former client in his previous life, no response is made to clear up the allegation.
And when, as is also happening this week, the chief executive chooses to deal with a major health scare by running around like a headless chicken and establishing no less than three separate committees to investigate how all this came about, the strong suspicion lingers that his real purpose is to defuse the situation and ensure that blame moves somewhere other than to Tamar.
A generously minded person might say that, in all three instances, reasonable explanations are to be found, but these same generously minded people would, at the very least, expect some attempt to communicate with the public on matters like these, which are very much in the public interest.
This, of course, is not merely a matter of communication but concerns the fundamental way the government is run.
The problem at the heart of the CY Leung administration is, unsurprisingly, CY himself.
People who work with him say that he is instinctively secretive and simply does not understand why he needs to explain his actions.
Moreover, he is a man of fixed ideas who does not appreciate the notion of anyone questioning these ideas.
Thirdly, he simply does not understand the concept of accountability.
In his mind being called to account is a challenge to his authority and renders the challengers as being opponents, even in circumstances where they are genuinely trying to be helpful.
This mindset was on full display this week when the officials were removed without any consultation, even with the Executive Council.
The allegations relating to property development in Discovery Bay were simply ignored, and as for the lead poisoning scandal, things go from bad to worse as the government blunders in all directions trying to make it disappear.
It would be unfair to say that CY is the only head of government who behaves in this way, but in systems of governance that contain proper checks and balances, the power of the person at the top is circumscribed and there is scope for improving governance.
Moreover, there is the ultimate sanction of a democratic system where the electorate is given a chance to decide who rules.
This form of control is crude and imperfect, but it sure as hell has a salutary impact on the mindset of leaders who have no choice but to seek a popular mandate.
Accountability is too expensive
Lamentably, CY Leung is not alone among Hong Kong leaders who simply don’t understand how a properly functioning system of government works.
This inability to comprehend is shared by his allies in the pro-government camp that dominates the legislature.
Some hide this better than others, but we should be grateful to the legislator Ip Kwok-him, of the Democratic Alliance for the Betterment and Progress of Hong Kong, for inadvertently letting the cat out of the bag this week, when he told a local newspaper the reason he had failed to ask a single question in Legco was because it cost too much for officials to prepare answers.
Mr. Ip clearly believes that accountability would be all right as long it can be cost-free.
Trying to disentangle this nonsense is above my pay grade, but at the very least, it can be said that when a legislator believes that his job is to save money by not doing his job, surely he should take this belief to its logical conclusion and return the generous salary he is paid for whatever it is that he believes he is supposed to be doing in Legco.
How many civil servants does it take to do anything at all?
Finally, in case there is a remaining scintilla of doubt about the dysfunctionality at the heart of government, we were informed this week that no fewer than nine different government departments are involved in the business of maintaining roadside trees.
Two major tree collapses, causing injuries, in the space of a single week have highlighted that something is wrong here.
Fortunately, I have a suggestion for how to solve the problem – it’s simple: form a committee to look into the matter, and remember, speed is not of the essence.
Coconuts
沒有留言:
張貼留言