Dr Spencer Lai (賴鶴明博士): 02月05日後佔中第52天

02月05日後佔中第52天

誠邀中大同學出席雨傘運動檢討會

上一年香港的雨傘運動是由大專學界發動，學聯、八大院校學生會在雨傘運動中一直扮演非常重要的角色。各間大專院校的同學都曾積極參與其中，為香港民主而公民抗命。雨傘運動的佔領行動雖然已遭專制政府無理清場，但我們在雨傘運動中表現出追求民主、公義的決心並沒有隨之而消失，我們必須要把這份精神承傳下去。所以，我們有必要檢討整場雨傘運動的成敗得失，為下一波運動作最好的準備。

學聯及中大學生會希望直接和同學作深入的交流，一起檢討雨傘運動及商討未來民主運動的走向。我們也希望和同學分享我們對雨傘運動的看法及解釋運動中我們的決定。中大的雨傘運動檢討會的詳情如下：

日期：二月五日 (星期四)
時間：下午六時半
地點：民主女神像前
講者：方志信（中大學生會外務副會長、學聯常委）
岑敖暉（學聯副秘書長）
中大學生會懇切希望中大同學出席是次檢討會，繼續和我們一起在民主路上並肩同行。

張曉明讚特首警隊處理佔中

對於持續共79日的佔領運動，中聯辦主任張曉明昨在中聯辦酒會致辭時，首次開腔評論事件，他點名稱讚特首梁振英及警隊處理佔中手法，並大讚反佔中者。張曉明提出數點佔中反思，指除各界要珍惜香港法治優勢外，更特別提到要給青少年更多關愛，將中國歷史文化、國情教育「擺在香港青少年教育的突出位置」。

劉慧卿批對特區指手劃腳

民主黨主席劉慧卿批評張曉明言論如在教特區政府工作，是對特區指手劃腳，很不恰當。部分泛民亦獲邀出席中聯辦酒會，公民黨湯家驊、郭榮鏗、民主黨單仲偕到場約10分鐘便離去。公民黨郭家麒在會場外舉起黃傘，被數名保安告知不能帶傘入場，故抗議離場，並將「我要真普選」橫額交予中聯辦官員。

張曉明昨在酒會上致辭，稱要讚美多方人士，包括以習近平為總書記的中央領導。在香港問題上，他點名稱讚特首梁振英帶領特區政府銳意改革，推進民主，特別是面對佔中挑戰，「處變不驚，妥善處置」。張曉明又讚揚警隊在佔中上「恪盡職守、忍辱負重」，稱與世界各地同類事件比較，「佔中的處置結果可謂範例」。

稱不容散佈港獨言論

張曉明指出，佔領香港社會造成深重創傷，指出多項反思。他指首先要反思如何正確處理香港與中央的關係，他強調香港有高度自治權，不意味可以不受中央管轄，包括在普選的決定權，「更不能容許藉口高度自治而排斥中央對香港的管治權，散佈港獨言論」，稱在香港要「擺正」與中央關係，增強維護國家安全意識等。

張曉明又警示要小心呵護法治，表明「在法律面前，任何人都沒有任性的特權」。

將青少年國情教育擺在突出位置

他又特別提出要更關愛青少年，又表明要將中國「歷史文化和國情教育擺在香港青少年教育的突出位置」。劉慧卿批評張曉明對港指手劃腳，法治、青年等香港問題都指點，是將一國兩制界線弄模糊。她說一國兩制很脆弱，成功與否在於中央的自我約制，但現時中聯辦在港卻「愈行愈前」。該黨何俊仁批評張曉明將港獨「拉到好闊」，抗拒中央已是港獨，形容是上綱上線，又認為張曉明連中央也要讚是「無大無細，好似長江賣樓經理讚李嘉誠遷冊叻咁」。

公民黨黨魁梁家傑批評張曉明的說法，反映中央將法律當成統治工具，質疑對方不懂法治，「叫佢看看（大律師公會前主席）石永泰的文章吧」。工聯會黃國健認為，張曉明就佔中稱讚各方恰當，因佔中的落幕方式於各地的確少有，他認為張提及港獨，因在中央眼中，港獨苗頭不能接受，但由於沒有法律、執法手段能禁制港獨，故張曉明、梁振英等對付港獨「都只能用把口」。

Editorial Harmful political struggle	明報社評官民不按牌理出牌政治鬥爭傷害社會
SINCE the Legislative Council (Legco) resumed its session this legislative year, pan-democratic legislators have paralysed legislative business and blocked government business with filibusters in their non-cooperation movement. The administration has tried to get its applications for funds through the Finance Committee by shuffling its agenda. As neither officials nor legislators stick to the rules of the game, the fight between them may derail the administration's plans. The newest battle between them is about funding for the Innovation and Technology Bureau. The political fight between the administration and the pan-democratic camp has kept intensifying. That does not seem to advantage either in any way, but their struggle has harmed society tangibly and intangibly. Legco being as it is, it is hard to carry out government policies, and even the hope for effective government now seems extravagant. One cannot but be worried about Hong Kong's future.	立法會本立法年度復會之後，泛民議員開展不合作運動，以「拉布」癱瘓議事，阻撓政府施政；政府則以調動議程等方式，爭取個別事項在財務委員會獲撥款通過。由於政府與議員都不按牌理出牌，於是形成官民脫軌混戰，最新一樁是就創新及科技局撥款的對抗。政府與泛民議員的政治鬥爭愈來愈尖銳和激烈，從不同角度都看不到對雙方有任何好處，反而社會承受着有形無形損失。按立法會目前的情况，不僅難以落實政策措施，改變停滯不前的局面，連有效管治也成為奢侈的憧憬。香港前景使人憂心忡忡。
There is no denying that pan-democratic legislators fight for democracy, but it is impossible to see why they have done so by causing society to harm and maim itself. They were stakeholders in the Occupy movement. The blocking of thoroughfares affected citizens' lives and made it hard to scrape a living, but they did not care one iota. Some legislators who are lawyers have expressed the view that it does not undermine the rule of law to defy court injunctions. That has provoked an outcry. They have tried to block government business with abnormal behaviour in the legislative chamber. It is not clear how it would benefit society, but it is obvious that their doings have affected citizens' lives and impeded development. Though pan-democratic legislators have tried to prettify their filibustering and other non-cooperation tactics in recent months, surveys show citizens now take a poorer view of them.	無人可以否定泛民議員追求民主，只是為何演變至使社會自傷、自殘方式為之，使人無法理解。佔領行動爆發之後，泛民議員成了持份者，他們對堵塞主要幹道，影響市民生活生計，毫不在乎，法庭頒發禁制令，有法律背景的議員認為不遵守也不損害法治的說法，輿論嘩然；他們在立法會以不正常議事方式，阻撓政府施政，看不到如何有益於市民與社會，民生受影響、發展受阻延卻是顯而易見。綜合而言，最近數月泛民議員雖然美化「拉布」等不合作做法，但是一些調查結果，反映市民較多地以負面看待他們。
According to the latest survey conducted by the Public Opinion Programme at the University of Hong Kong, since the Occupy movement ended, pro-establishment legislators have regained their strength, but pan-democratic legislators have kept losing their popularity. The popularity ratings of Alan Leong (the Civic Party), Emily Lau (the Democratic Party) and Lee Cheuk-yan (the Labour Party) have respectively fallen to their new lows since 2006, 1994 and 1995. It is clear from pan-democratic legislators' falling popularity ratings that citizens have made use of the "steelyards" in their minds. Pan-democratic legislators may, if they ignore such information, have to pay for it politically.	港大民意研究計劃最新民意調查結果，顯示佔領行動之後，建制陣營議員開始恢復元氣，泛民議員則繼續失勢，其中曝光較多的公民黨梁家傑、民主黨劉慧卿和工黨李卓人的得分，分別跌至2006年、1994年及1995年以來個人新低。泛民議員評分普遍沉降，顯示市民「心中的一把秤」在發揮作用，若泛民漠視相關信息，在政治上或許要付出代價。
It may not be above criticism for the administration to have shuffled the agenda in its fight with pan-democratic legislators over its application for funding for the Innovation and Technology Bureau. However, had the agenda not been altered, pan-democratic legislators would have continued to filibuster about the Fisheries Development Loan Fund, and it would be doubtful that discussion of the application could begin. The application has at least come to be discussed because of what the government has done. Whether it will go through depends on pan-democratic legislators' reactions. Pan-democratic legislators' non-cooperation is directed at Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying. Their moves are personal rather than based on merit. Because they have such an attitude, public opinion is on the whole unfavourable to them. They always say they represent the will of the people, but their attitude towards the Occupy movement, the constitutional reform plan and the non-cooperation movement is clearly at variance with what citizens wish. It is clear in many ways what citizens are unhappy with and what they look forward to. We wonder whether the right honourable Legco members are willing to listen to them or see what they wish.	政府與泛民議員在創新及科技局的撥款申請對決，政府臨時抽改議程的做法，或有可議之處，不過，按原來議程，泛民議員在漁業發展貸款基金「拉布」，則創科局能否提出來正式討論，亦成疑問，政府的做法，起碼有機會討論，能否過關，還看泛民議員如何反制了。泛民議員的不合作做法，主要是衝着特首梁振英而來，這種對人不對事的取態，輿情總的而言對泛民議員不利；泛民一貫以代表民意自居，但是在佔領行動、政改方案和不合作運動，泛民議員取態明顯與民意有落差。公衆的不滿與期盼，已經在不少方面顯露出來，未知尊貴的立法會議員是否願意看得到、聽得見。